⚡ Quick Analysis: CALDE® GUARD vs Conventional
€21.40k
28.4% savings
689h
66.6% reduction
9,085 kg
93.8% reduction
Formulas: Cost savings = Annual cost (selected) − Annual cost (CALDE®) | Downtime reduction = Annual downtime (selected) − Annual downtime (CALDE®) | CO2 reduction = Annual CO2 (selected) − Annual CO2 (CALDE®)
📊 Break-even Analysis: CALDE® GUARD vs Conventional
Explore scenarios where Conventional lining could become more cost-effective than CALDE® GUARD. Each scenario isolates one variable while keeping others at their default values.
📋 Summary: When does Conventional win?
| Scenario |
Current Value |
Break-even Point |
Likelihood |
| Labour cost |
€31/h |
€7.79/h |
Very unlikely |
| Material cost multiplier |
1.0x |
1.10x |
Possible |
| Maintenance hours |
2h |
7.67h |
Unlikely |
| Melts per lining |
350 |
251 |
Unlikely |
🌍 CO2 Impact Analysis: CALDE® GUARD vs Conventional
Discover the environmental and financial benefits of reduced CO2 emissions with CALDE® GUARD.